bar: has quality service

Related concepts

Parents	spot Weight: 0.62 , candy bar Weight: 0.62 , feature Weight: 0.60 , location Weight: 0.59
Siblings	chocolate bar Weight: 0.66 , japanese restaurant Weight: 0.64 , bar stool Weight: 0.63 , karaoke Weight: 0.58 , disco Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality service	1.00
has quality services	0.92
has quality good	0.81
has quality bad	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(location, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(bar, has quality service)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(bar, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(location, has quality services)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(bar, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(location, has quality services)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(bar, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(karaoke, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(bar, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(disco, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(location, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(bar, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(bar, has quality service)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(bar, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(disco, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(disco, has quality bad)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(bar, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(karaoke, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(karaoke, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(bar, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(bar, has quality service)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(bar, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(bar, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(bar, has quality service)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(bar, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(bar, has quality service)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(bar, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(location, has quality services)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(bar, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(karaoke, has quality bad)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(bar, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(disco, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(bar, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(location, has quality services)