bar: is dark inside

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spot
Weight: 0.62
, candy bar
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chocolate bar
Weight: 0.66
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.64
, bar stool
Weight: 0.63
, karaoke
Weight: 0.58
, disco
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dark inside 1.00
has state dark 0.86
appear dark 0.83
leave dark marks 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(spot, appear dark)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(bar, is dark inside)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(bar, is dark inside)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(spot, appear dark)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(bar, is dark inside)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(spot, appear dark)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(spot, appear dark)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(bar, is dark inside)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(bar, is dark inside)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(bar, is dark inside)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(bar, is dark inside)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(bar, is dark inside)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(bar, has state dark)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(bar, is dark inside)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bar, has state dark)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(bar, is dark inside)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(bar, has state dark)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(bar, is dark inside)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(bar, has state dark)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(bar, is dark inside)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(bar, is dark inside)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(bar, is dark inside)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(bar, is dark inside)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(bar, is dark inside)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(bar, is dark inside)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(spot, appear dark)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(bar, is dark inside)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(spot, appear dark)