bar: serve salty snacks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spot
Weight: 0.62
, candy bar
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chocolate bar
Weight: 0.66
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.64
, bar stool
Weight: 0.63
, karaoke
Weight: 0.58
, disco
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
serve salty snacks 1.00
serve snacks 0.95
serve food 0.83
serve peanuts 0.81
have drinks 0.79
water down drinks 0.78
serve ginger 0.78
have strong drinks 0.77
have cheap drinks 0.77
charge for drinks 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, serve ginger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, serve ginger)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, serve ginger)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(bar, serve salty snacks)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(bar, serve food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(bar, serve food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(bar, have drinks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(bar, serve food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(bar, water down drinks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bar, serve peanuts)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(bar, charge for drinks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(bar, water down drinks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(bar, water down drinks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(bar, have drinks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(bar, have drinks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(bar, charge for drinks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(bar, serve peanuts)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bar, serve peanuts)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(bar, serve peanuts)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(bar, charge for drinks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bar, serve food)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bar, water down drinks)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(bar, charge for drinks)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(bar, have drinks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bar, serve salty snacks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bar, serve salty snacks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bar, serve salty snacks)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, serve ginger)