barbecue: be at back yard

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.66
, food
Weight: 0.60
, staple
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
Siblings grill
Weight: 0.61
, picnic
Weight: 0.36
, dinner
Weight: 0.36
, chili
Weight: 0.36
, bbq
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at back yard 1.00
be at your back yard 0.98
be at yard 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at back yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bbq, be at back yard)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at back yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(grill, be at your back yard)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at back yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(grill, be at yard)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at back yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(grill, be at back yard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(barbecue, be at back yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bbq, be at back yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(bbq, be at back yard)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(barbecue, be at back yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(grill, be at back yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(grill, be at back yard)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(barbecue, be at back yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(grill, be at your back yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(grill, be at your back yard)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(barbecue, be at back yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(grill, be at yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(grill, be at yard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(barbecue, be at back yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(barbecue, be at back yard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(barbecue, be at back yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(barbecue, be at back yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at back yard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(barbecue, be at back yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(barbecue, be at back yard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at back yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(grill, be at back yard)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at back yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(grill, be at yard)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at back yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(grill, be at your back yard)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at back yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(bbq, be at back yard)