barbershop: have white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents movie
Weight: 0.58
, film
Weight: 0.58
, service
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, store
Weight: 0.52
Siblings barber
Weight: 0.35
, barber shop
Weight: 0.35
, salon
Weight: 0.34
, beauty salon
Weight: 0.34
, barbershop quartet
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have white 1.00
have red 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(barber shop, have white)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(barber, have white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(barbershop, have white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(barber, have white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(barber, have white)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(barbershop, have white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(barber shop, have white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(barber shop, have white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(barbershop, have white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(barbershop, have white)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(barbershop, have white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(barbershop, have red)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(barbershop, have white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(barbershop, have red)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(barbershop, have white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(barbershop, have red)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(barbershop, have white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(barbershop, have white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(barbershop, have white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(barbershop, have white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(barbershop, have white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(barber, have white)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(barber shop, have white)