barbie: is negative influence

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.57
, icon
Weight: 0.55
, character
Weight: 0.55
, toy
Weight: 0.55
Siblings barbies
Weight: 0.33
, pepsi
Weight: 0.32
, subaru
Weight: 0.32
, billabong
Weight: 0.31
, burberry
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is negative influence 1.00
is bad influence 0.92
is good influence 0.91
is negative 0.89
has quality influence 0.87
be such bad influence on girls 0.84
be such bad influence on little girls 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(barbie, is negative influence)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(barbie, is bad influence)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(barbie, is good influence)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(barbie, is negative)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(barbie, has quality influence)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(barbie, be such bad influence on girls)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(barbie, be such bad influence on little girls)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(barbie, is bad influence)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(barbie, is negative)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(barbie, has quality influence)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(barbie, is good influence)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(barbie, is negative)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(barbie, is bad influence)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(barbie, is negative)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(barbie, be such bad influence on girls)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(barbie, be such bad influence on little girls)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(barbie, is good influence)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(barbie, has quality influence)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(barbie, is bad influence)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(barbie, be such bad influence on girls)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(barbie, be such bad influence on little girls)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(barbie, be such bad influence on little girls)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(barbie, be such bad influence on girls)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(barbie, is good influence)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(barbie, has quality influence)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(barbie, is negative influence)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(barbie, is negative influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(barbie, is negative influence)