bark: be at forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ingredient
Weight: 0.59
, insect
Weight: 0.58
, feature
Weight: 0.55
, sound
Weight: 0.53
, raw material
Weight: 0.52
Siblings mosquito bite
Weight: 0.33
, cinnamon
Weight: 0.33
, aloe vera
Weight: 0.33
, rosemary
Weight: 0.32
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at forest 1.00
be at in forest 0.99
be at forest when tree fall 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(sound, be at forest when tree fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bark, be at forest)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(insect, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bark, be at forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bark, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(insect, be at in forest)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bark, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(sound, be at forest when tree fall)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bark, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(sound, be at forest when tree fall)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bark, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(insect, be at in forest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(insect, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bark, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(bark, be at forest)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(sound, be at forest when tree fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bark, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(bark, be at forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.10
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bark, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(bark, be at forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(bark, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bark, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bark, be at forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bark, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bark, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bark, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(insect, be at in forest)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bark, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sound, be at forest when tree fall)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(bark, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(insect, be at in forest)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(bark, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sound, be at forest when tree fall)