barrel: close stores

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents container
Weight: 0.62
, store
Weight: 0.58
, detail
Weight: 0.57
, obstacle
Weight: 0.56
Siblings breech
Weight: 0.40
, rifling
Weight: 0.36
, gas tank
Weight: 0.32
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.32
, cup
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
close stores 1.00
be called box stores 0.85
be called big box stores 0.84
is store 0.84
have store brand 0.79
close 2017 0.78
close 0.78
need in malls 0.78
have outlets 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(store, close) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(barrel, close stores)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(container, is store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(barrel, close stores)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(barrel, close stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(container, is store)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(barrel, close stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(store, close)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(barrel, close stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(store, close)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(barrel, close stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(container, is store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(store, close) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(barrel, close stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(barrel, close stores)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(container, is store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(barrel, close stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(barrel, close stores)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(barrel, close stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(barrel, close stores)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(barrel, close stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(barrel, close stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(barrel, close stores)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(barrel, close stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(barrel, close stores)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(barrel, close stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(container, is store)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(barrel, close stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(store, close)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(barrel, close stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(container, is store)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(barrel, close stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(store, close)