barrel: leave michigan avenue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents container
Weight: 0.62
, store
Weight: 0.58
, detail
Weight: 0.57
, obstacle
Weight: 0.56
Siblings breech
Weight: 0.40
, rifling
Weight: 0.36
, gas tank
Weight: 0.32
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.32
, cup
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
leave michigan avenue 1.00
leave avenue 0.89
be in nj closed on sunday 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(store, be in nj closed on sunday)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(barrel, leave michigan avenue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(barrel, leave michigan avenue)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(store, be in nj closed on sunday)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(barrel, leave michigan avenue)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(store, be in nj closed on sunday)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(store, be in nj closed on sunday)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(barrel, leave michigan avenue)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(barrel, leave michigan avenue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(barrel, leave michigan avenue)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(barrel, leave michigan avenue)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(barrel, leave michigan avenue)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(barrel, leave avenue)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(barrel, leave michigan avenue)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(barrel, leave avenue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(barrel, leave michigan avenue)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(barrel, leave avenue)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(barrel, leave michigan avenue)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(barrel, leave avenue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(barrel, leave michigan avenue)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(barrel, leave michigan avenue)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(barrel, leave michigan avenue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(barrel, leave michigan avenue)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(barrel, leave michigan avenue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(barrel, leave michigan avenue)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(store, be in nj closed on sunday)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(barrel, leave michigan avenue)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(store, be in nj closed on sunday)