basement: be used to storage of produce

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.65
, space
Weight: 0.65
, floor
Weight: 0.65
, area
Weight: 0.62
, attic
Weight: 0.61
Siblings cellar
Weight: 0.36
, locker room
Weight: 0.36
, hallway
Weight: 0.36
, top floor
Weight: 0.35
, stairwell
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to storage of produce 1.00
be used to storage 0.93
be used to store fall produce 0.79
be used to storage of unused junk 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(space, be used to storage)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(basement, be used to storage of produce)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(attic, be used to storage)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(basement, be used to storage of produce)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(attic, be used to storage of unused junk)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(basement, be used to storage of produce)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(attic, be used to storage)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(attic, be used to storage of unused junk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(space, be used to storage)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(space, be used to storage)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(attic, be used to storage)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(attic, be used to storage of unused junk)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(cellar, be used to store fall produce)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(space, be used to storage)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(basement, be used to storage of produce)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(attic, be used to storage)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(basement, be used to storage of produce)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(attic, be used to storage of unused junk)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(basement, be used to storage of produce)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(cellar, be used to store fall produce)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cellar, be used to store fall produce)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(basement, be used to storage of produce)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(basement, be used to storage)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(basement, be used to storage)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(basement, be used to storage)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(basement, be used to storage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(basement, be used to storage of produce)

Typical implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(basement, be used to storage of produce)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(space, be used to storage)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(attic, be used to storage)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(attic, be used to storage of unused junk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cellar, be used to store fall produce)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(space, be used to storage)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(attic, be used to storage)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(basement, be used to storage of produce)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(attic, be used to storage of unused junk)