basset: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.55
, breed
Weight: 0.46
, hound
Weight: 0.41
Siblings cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.36
, beagle
Weight: 0.36
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.36
, small dog
Weight: 0.36
, dachshund
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is good for 0.86
has quality services 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(basset, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(basset, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(beagle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(beagle, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(basset, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(basset, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(basset, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(basset, is good for)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(basset, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(basset, is good for)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(basset, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(basset, has quality services)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(basset, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(basset, is good for)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(basset, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(basset, is good for)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(basset, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(basset, has quality services)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(basset, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(basset, has quality services)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(basset, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(basset, has quality services)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(basset, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(basset, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(basset, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(basset, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(basset, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(basset, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(beagle, has quality good)