bastard: has state names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, word
Weight: 0.56
, child
Weight: 0.54
, name
Weight: 0.54
, character
Weight: 0.47
Siblings bitch
Weight: 0.35
, asshole
Weight: 0.34
, shit
Weight: 0.34
, whore
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state names 1.00
has state name 0.92
be last names 0.90
have name 0.86
have last name 0.83
be names decided 0.82
be last names decided 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(bastard, has state names)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(bastard, have name)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(bastard, has state name)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(bastard, has state name)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(bastard, has state name)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(bastard, have name)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(bastard, have last name)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bastard, has state name)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(bastard, be names decided)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(bastard, have name)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(bastard, be last names)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(bastard, be names decided)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(bastard, be names decided)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(bastard, have last name)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(bastard, be last names)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(bastard, be last names)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(bastard, be last names decided)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(bastard, be names decided)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(bastard, be last names)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(bastard, have last name)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(bastard, be last names decided)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(bastard, be last names decided)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(bastard, be last names decided)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(bastard, have last name)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bastard, have name)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bastard, has state names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bastard, has state names)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(bastard, has state names)