batter: fall off fried chicken

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, pitcher
Weight: 0.46
, flour
Weight: 0.46
, onion ring
Weight: 0.44
Siblings crepe
Weight: 0.47
, bunt
Weight: 0.34
, strikeout
Weight: 0.33
, pitching
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
fall off fried chicken 1.00
fall off chicken 0.92
fall off fish 0.80
come off fish 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(batter, fall off fried chicken)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(batter, fall off fried chicken)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(batter, fall off fried chicken)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(batter, fall off chicken)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(batter, fall off fried chicken)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(batter, fall off chicken)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(batter, fall off fried chicken)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(batter, fall off chicken)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(batter, fall off fried chicken)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(batter, fall off fish)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(batter, fall off fried chicken)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(batter, fall off fish)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(batter, fall off fried chicken)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(batter, fall off fish)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(batter, fall off fried chicken)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(batter, fall off chicken)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(batter, fall off fried chicken)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(batter, fall off fish)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(batter, fall off fried chicken)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(batter, come off fish)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(batter, fall off fried chicken)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(batter, come off fish)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(batter, fall off fried chicken)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(batter, come off fish)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(batter, fall off fried chicken)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(batter, come off fish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(batter, fall off fried chicken)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(batter, fall off fried chicken)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(batter, fall off fried chicken)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(batter, fall off fried chicken)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(batter, fall off fried chicken)