bay: end up with travis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents estuary
Weight: 0.66
, shallow water
Weight: 0.57
, area
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
Siblings chesapeake bay
Weight: 0.81
, shoreline
Weight: 0.32
, marsh
Weight: 0.32
, cove
Weight: 0.32
, pier
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
end up with travis 1.00
be morgan at cnn 0.77
is morgan 0.77
is morgan wrong 0.77
be morgan asshole 0.76
go to carlton 0.76
is morgan alive 0.76
be in up 0.76
be in lincolnshire end 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pier, be morgan asshole)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pier, is morgan wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pier, be morgan at cnn)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pier, is morgan alive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pier, is morgan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pier, is morgan)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(pier, is morgan)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pier, is morgan alive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(pier, is morgan alive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pier, be morgan at cnn)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(pier, be morgan at cnn)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(pier, be morgan asshole)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pier, be morgan asshole)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(pier, is morgan wrong)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(pier, is morgan wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(bay, end up with travis)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(bay, go to carlton)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(bay, go to carlton)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(bay, go to carlton)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(bay, go to carlton)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bay, end up with travis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(bay, end up with travis)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(pier, is morgan)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pier, is morgan alive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pier, be morgan at cnn)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pier, be morgan asshole)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bay, end up with travis)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pier, is morgan wrong)