bbq: be served with white bread

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents favorite
Weight: 0.59
, sauce
Weight: 0.58
, feature
Weight: 0.54
, event
Weight: 0.53
, sandwich
Weight: 0.52
Siblings barbecue
Weight: 0.35
, hot sauce
Weight: 0.33
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.33
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.33
, spongebob squarepants
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be served with white bread 1.00
be served with bread 0.98
come with white bread 0.91
come with bread 0.88
is bread 0.86
be served with pickle 0.83
be served with pork 0.81
put on cooked pasta 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sandwich, is bread)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bbq, be served with white bread)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(sandwich, be served with pickle)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bbq, be served with white bread)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(sandwich, be served with pickle)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(sandwich, is bread)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be served with pickle)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, is bread)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(apple sauce, be served with pork)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti sauce, put on cooked pasta)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sandwich, is bread)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(bbq, be served with white bread)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(sandwich, be served with pickle)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(bbq, be served with white bread)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(apple sauce, be served with pork)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(apple sauce, be served with pork)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(spaghetti sauce, put on cooked pasta)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(spaghetti sauce, put on cooked pasta)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(bbq, be served with white bread)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(bbq, be served with bread)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(bbq, be served with bread)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(bbq, come with white bread)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(bbq, come with white bread)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(bbq, be served with bread)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(bbq, come with white bread)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(bbq, be served with bread)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(bbq, come with bread)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(bbq, come with white bread)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(bbq, come with bread)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(bbq, come with bread)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(bbq, come with bread)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bbq, be served with white bread)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bbq, be served with white bread)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sandwich, is bread)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(sandwich, be served with pickle)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(apple sauce, be served with pork)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(spaghetti sauce, put on cooked pasta)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sandwich, is bread)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(bbq, be served with white bread)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(sandwich, be served with pickle)