bc: be prone to earthquakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.57
, system
Weight: 0.52
, city
Weight: 0.51
, item
Weight: 0.50
, program
Weight: 0.49
Siblings venice
Weight: 0.33
, lexington
Weight: 0.33
, springfield
Weight: 0.33
, victoria
Weight: 0.33
, montreal
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be prone to earthquakes 1.00
have earthquakes 0.93
have many earthquakes 0.91
be at risk of earthquake 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(bc, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(bc, be prone to earthquakes)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(bc, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(bc, have earthquakes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(bc, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(bc, have earthquakes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(bc, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(bc, have earthquakes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(bc, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(bc, have many earthquakes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(bc, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bc, have many earthquakes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(bc, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(bc, have many earthquakes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(bc, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(bc, have many earthquakes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(bc, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(bc, have earthquakes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(bc, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(bc, be at risk of earthquake)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(bc, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bc, be at risk of earthquake)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(bc, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(bc, be at risk of earthquake)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(bc, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(bc, be at risk of earthquake)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(bc, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(bc, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(bc, be prone to earthquakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(bc, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(bc, be prone to earthquakes)