beak: help birds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.44
, animal
Weight: 0.43
, characteristic
Weight: 0.43
, structure
Weight: 0.43
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.31
, tail
Weight: 0.31
, tree frog
Weight: 0.31
, cassowary
Weight: 0.31
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
help birds 1.00
be better than teeth for birds 0.85
hummingbirds from africa 0.78
hummingbirds from america 0.77
be cut off chickens 0.77
hummingbirds from north america 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(beak, help birds)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(beak, be better than teeth for birds)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(beak, be better than teeth for birds)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(beak, be better than teeth for birds)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(beak, be cut off chickens)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(beak, be cut off chickens)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(beak, hummingbirds from africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(beak, hummingbirds from america)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(beak, be better than teeth for birds)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(beak, hummingbirds from north america)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(beak, hummingbirds from africa)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beak, hummingbirds from america)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(beak, hummingbirds from north america)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(beak, be cut off chickens)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(beak, hummingbirds from america)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(beak, hummingbirds from north america)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(beak, hummingbirds from africa)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(beak, be cut off chickens)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(beak, hummingbirds from america)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(beak, hummingbirds from africa)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(beak, hummingbirds from north america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(beak, help birds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(beak, help birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(beak, help birds)