beam: working on

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.57
, material
Weight: 0.56
, element
Weight: 0.54
, construction
Weight: 0.54
, apparatus
Weight: 0.53
Siblings eiffel tower
Weight: 0.32
, helix
Weight: 0.32
, arch
Weight: 0.32
, titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
working on 1.00
stop working 0.87
work 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(element, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(beam, working on)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(construction, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(beam, working on)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(construction, work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(element, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(element, work)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(construction, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(helix, work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(arch, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(element, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beam, working on)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(construction, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beam, working on)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(arch, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(arch, work)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(helix, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(helix, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(beam, working on)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(beam, stop working)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(beam, stop working)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(beam, work)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(beam, stop working)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(beam, stop working)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(beam, work)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(beam, work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beam, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(beam, working on)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(beam, working on)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(construction, work)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(element, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(helix, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(arch, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(construction, work)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(beam, working on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(element, work)