bean: be important in chicago

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents staple
Weight: 0.63
, vegetable
Weight: 0.63
, legume
Weight: 0.62
, mexican food
Weight: 0.62
Siblings black eyed pea
Weight: 0.68
, broad bean
Weight: 0.65
, rice
Weight: 0.63
, lima
Weight: 0.62
, green bean
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in chicago 1.00
be in chicago 0.98
be famous in chicago 0.96
be important in japan 0.76
be in hawaii 0.76
be used in mexico 0.76
be important to thailand 0.76
be important in korea 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(staple, be in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(bean, be important in chicago)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(staple, be in hawaii)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(staple, be in hawaii)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rice, be important in japan)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(staple, be in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(bean, be important in chicago)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(rice, be important in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(rice, be important in japan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(bean, be important in chicago)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(bean, be famous in chicago)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(bean, be famous in chicago)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(bean, be famous in chicago)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(bean, be in chicago)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bean, be in chicago)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(bean, be in chicago)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(bean, be famous in chicago)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(bean, be in chicago)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(bean, be used in mexico)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(bean, be used in mexico)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(bean, be used in mexico)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(bean, be used in mexico)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bean, be important in chicago)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(bean, be important in chicago)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(staple, be in hawaii)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rice, be important in japan)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(bean, be important in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(staple, be in hawaii)