bear: eat cubs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.68
, wild animal
Weight: 0.66
, carnivore
Weight: 0.64
Siblings black bear
Weight: 0.86
, polar bear
Weight: 0.79
, giant panda
Weight: 0.60
, panda
Weight: 0.59
, koala
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
eat cubs 1.00
eat babies 0.81
eat sea lions 0.81
eat wolves 0.79
eat eagles 0.78
eat beluga whales 0.77
eat fish 0.77
eat whales 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(bear, eat cubs)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, eat cubs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(bear, eat cubs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, eat fish)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(bear, eat cubs)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(polar bear, eat cubs)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(polar bear, eat cubs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(bear, eat cubs)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(polar bear, eat fish)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(polar bear, eat fish)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(bear, eat cubs)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(bear, eat cubs)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(bear, eat cubs)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bear, eat fish)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(bear, eat cubs)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(bear, eat fish)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(bear, eat cubs)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(bear, eat fish)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(bear, eat cubs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(bear, eat fish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(bear, eat cubs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(bear, eat cubs)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(bear, eat cubs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(bear, eat cubs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(bear, eat cubs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(bear, eat cubs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(polar bear, eat cubs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(bear, eat cubs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(polar bear, eat fish)