bear: has four leg

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.68
, wild animal
Weight: 0.66
, carnivore
Weight: 0.64
Siblings black bear
Weight: 0.86
, polar bear
Weight: 0.79
, giant panda
Weight: 0.60
, panda
Weight: 0.59
, big dipper
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
has four leg 1.00
stand on four leg 0.93
stand on two leg 0.90
has two ear 0.79
stand on their hind leg 0.77
wants to hump your leg 0.76
put his paw on your knee 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dog, has two ear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bear, has four leg)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bear, has four leg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dog, has two ear)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bear, has four leg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dog, has two ear)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dog, has two ear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(bear, has four leg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(bear, has four leg)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bear, has four leg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(bear, has four leg)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(bear, has four leg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bear, stand on their hind leg)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(bear, has four leg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bear, stand on their hind leg)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bear, has four leg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(bear, stand on their hind leg)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(bear, has four leg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(bear, stand on their hind leg)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(bear, has four leg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bear, has four leg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bear, has four leg)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bear, has four leg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bear, has four leg)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bear, has four leg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(dog, has two ear)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(bear, has four leg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(dog, has two ear)