beauty: is attractive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fairy tale
Weight: 0.65
, quality
Weight: 0.63
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, characteristic
Weight: 0.62
Siblings hair salon
Weight: 0.68
, glory
Weight: 0.65
, grace kelly
Weight: 0.64
, waterfall
Weight: 0.59
, samantha
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
is attractive 1.00
attractive in men 0.90
is expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(quality, attractive in men)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(beauty, is attractive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(beauty, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(quality, attractive in men)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(beauty, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(quality, attractive in men)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(beauty, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(glory, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(beauty, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hair salon, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(quality, attractive in men)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(beauty, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(beauty, is attractive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(beauty, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(glory, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(glory, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(beauty, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hair salon, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hair salon, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(beauty, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(beauty, is attractive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(beauty, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(beauty, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(beauty, is attractive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(beauty, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(beauty, is attractive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(beauty, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(quality, attractive in men)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(beauty, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(glory, is expensive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(beauty, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(hair salon, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(beauty, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(quality, attractive in men)