beaver: chop wood

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rodent
Weight: 0.77
, animal
Weight: 0.70
, mammal
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.62
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.38
, elk
Weight: 0.38
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, wolf
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
chop wood 1.00
chop down trees 0.91
eat wood 0.86
chew wood 0.84
chew on wood 0.84
gnaw wood 0.78
gnaw on wood 0.78
cut down trees 0.77
cut trees 0.76
take bark off trees 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(beaver, chop wood)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, eat wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(beaver, chop wood)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(rabbit, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(rabbit, eat wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(beaver, chop wood)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(beaver, chop wood)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(beaver, chop wood)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(beaver, chop down trees)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(beaver, chop wood)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(beaver, chop down trees)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(beaver, chop wood)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(beaver, eat wood)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(beaver, chop wood)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(beaver, chop down trees)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(beaver, chop wood)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(beaver, eat wood)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(beaver, chop wood)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(beaver, chop wood)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(beaver, chop wood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(beaver, chop wood)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(beaver, chop wood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(beaver, chop wood)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rabbit, eat wood)