beaver: were eaten in middle ages

Related concepts

Parents	rodent Weight: 0.77 , animal Weight: 0.70 , mammal Weight: 0.68 , species Weight: 0.62
Siblings	grizzly bear Weight: 0.38 , elk Weight: 0.38 , rabbit Weight: 0.38 , wolf Weight: 0.37 , prairie dog Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
were eaten in middle ages	1.00
eat	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(mammal, eat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(beaver, were eaten in middle ages)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(animal, eat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(beaver, were eaten in middle ages)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.04

Plausible(rodent, eat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(beaver, were eaten in middle ages)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(rodent, eat)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(animal, eat)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(mammal, eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(rodent, eat)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(animal, eat)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(mammal, eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(wolf, eat)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(rabbit, eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(mammal, eat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(beaver, were eaten in middle ages)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(animal, eat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(beaver, were eaten in middle ages)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.04

Plausible(rodent, eat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(beaver, were eaten in middle ages)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(rabbit, eat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(rabbit, eat)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(wolf, eat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(wolf, eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(beaver, were eaten in middle ages)

Similarity expansion

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(beaver, eat)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(beaver, eat)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(beaver, eat)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(beaver, eat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(beaver, were eaten in middle ages)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(beaver, were eaten in middle ages)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(rodent, eat)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(mammal, eat)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(animal, eat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(rabbit, eat)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(wolf, eat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(rodent, eat)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(mammal, eat)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(beaver, were eaten in middle ages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(animal, eat)