beech: is good wood

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deciduous tree
Weight: 0.72
, species
Weight: 0.67
, tree
Weight: 0.61
, hardwood
Weight: 0.57
, variety
Weight: 0.55
Siblings oak tree
Weight: 0.39
, birch
Weight: 0.39
, oak
Weight: 0.39
, maple tree
Weight: 0.39
, douglas fir
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good wood 1.00
is wood 0.97
is hardwood 0.76
be used for furniture 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hardwood, be used for furniture)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(beech, is good wood)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be used for furniture)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be used for furniture)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(oak, is good wood)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(oak, is wood)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, is hardwood)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(oak, is hardwood)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(oak, be used for furniture)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hardwood, be used for furniture)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(beech, is good wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(oak, is wood)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(oak, is wood)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(oak, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(oak, is good wood)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(oak, is hardwood)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(oak, is hardwood)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(maple tree, is hardwood)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(maple tree, is hardwood)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(oak, be used for furniture)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(oak, be used for furniture)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(beech, is good wood)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(beech, is wood)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(beech, is wood)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(beech, is wood)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(beech, is hardwood)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(beech, is hardwood)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(beech, is hardwood)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(beech, be used for furniture)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(beech, is hardwood)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(beech, be used for furniture)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(beech, be used for furniture)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(beech, is wood)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(beech, be used for furniture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beech, is good wood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(beech, is good wood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(hardwood, be used for furniture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(oak, is wood)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(oak, is hardwood)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(maple tree, is hardwood)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(oak, is good wood)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(oak, be used for furniture)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(hardwood, be used for furniture)