beer: be at in restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.67
, beverage
Weight: 0.66
, drink
Weight: 0.63
, liquid
Weight: 0.61
Siblings guinness
Weight: 0.66
, porter
Weight: 0.57
, bud
Weight: 0.57
, corona
Weight: 0.57
, sol
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at in restaurant 1.00
be at restaurant 0.99
be at at hotel 0.82
be at hotel 0.81
be at bar 0.79
be serve in pub 0.79
be at pub 0.79
be at store 0.77
be at grocery store 0.76
be at liquor shop 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(drink, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(beer, be at in restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(beverage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(beer, be at in restaurant)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(drink, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(beer, be at in restaurant)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(drink, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(beer, be at in restaurant)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(beverage, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(beer, be at in restaurant)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(beverage, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(beer, be at in restaurant)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(alcoholic beverage, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(beer, be at in restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(beverage, be at restaurant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(drink, be at restaurant)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(alcoholic beverage, be at bar)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(beverage, be at bar)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(beverage, be at bar)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(drink, be at bar)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(drink, be at bar)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(drink, be at restaurant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(beverage, be at restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(drink, be at bar)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(drink, be at bar)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(beverage, be at bar)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(beverage, be at bar)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alcoholic beverage, be at bar)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(porter, be at at hotel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(porter, be at hotel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(porter, be at hotel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(guinness, be at bar)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(guinness, be at bar)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(drink, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(beverage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(drink, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(drink, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(beverage, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(beverage, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(alcoholic beverage, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(porter, be at at hotel)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(porter, be at at hotel)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(porter, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(porter, be at hotel)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(porter, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(porter, be at hotel)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(guinness, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(guinness, be at bar)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(guinness, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(guinness, be at bar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(beer, be at in restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(beer, be at store)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(beer, be serve in pub)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(beer, be serve in pub)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(beer, be at liquor shop)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(beer, be serve in pub)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(beer, be at pub)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at liquor shop)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(beer, be at pub)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at grocery store)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(beer, be at grocery store)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(beer, be at liquor shop)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(beer, be at grocery store)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(beer, be serve in pub)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(beer, be at liquor shop)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beer, be at grocery store)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(beer, be at store)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at pub)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(beer, be at pub)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at store)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(beer, be at store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(beer, be at in restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(beverage, be at restaurant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(drink, be at restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(alcoholic beverage, be at bar)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(beverage, be at bar)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(beverage, be at bar)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(drink, be at bar)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(drink, be at bar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(porter, be at at hotel)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(porter, be at hotel)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(porter, be at hotel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(guinness, be at bar)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(guinness, be at bar)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(beverage, be at restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(drink, be at restaurant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(alcoholic beverage, be at bar)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(beverage, be at bar)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(beverage, be at bar)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(drink, be at bar)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(beer, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(drink, be at bar)