beeswax: be bad for lips

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ingredient
Weight: 0.65
, substance
Weight: 0.62
, material
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.55
, wax
Weight: 0.55
Siblings honey
Weight: 0.35
, aloe vera
Weight: 0.35
, resin
Weight: 0.35
, latex
Weight: 0.35
, lavender
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for lips 1.00
be good for lips 0.99
be bad for hair 0.78
be good for skin 0.77
be good for hair 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wax, be good for hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(beeswax, be bad for lips)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(wax, be good for hair)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(wax, be good for hair)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(aloe vera, be good for skin)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lavender, be good for skin)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(aloe vera, be good for hair)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(lavender, be good for hair)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wax, be good for hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(beeswax, be bad for lips)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(lavender, be good for skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(lavender, be good for skin)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(aloe vera, be good for hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(aloe vera, be good for hair)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(lavender, be good for hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(lavender, be good for hair)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(aloe vera, be good for skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(aloe vera, be good for skin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(beeswax, be bad for lips)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(beeswax, be good for lips)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(beeswax, be good for lips)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(beeswax, be bad for hair)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(beeswax, be bad for hair)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(beeswax, be bad for hair)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(beeswax, be good for lips)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(beeswax, be bad for hair)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beeswax, be good for hair)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(beeswax, be good for hair)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(beeswax, be good for lips)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(beeswax, be good for skin)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(beeswax, be good for hair)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(beeswax, be good for skin)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(beeswax, be good for hair)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(beeswax, be good for skin)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(beeswax, be good for skin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(beeswax, be bad for lips)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(beeswax, be bad for lips)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wax, be good for hair)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lavender, be good for skin)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(aloe vera, be good for skin)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(aloe vera, be good for hair)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(lavender, be good for hair)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(beeswax, be bad for lips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wax, be good for hair)