beet: be good for athletes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vegetable
Weight: 0.70
, cabbage
Weight: 0.59
, crop
Weight: 0.56
, flavor
Weight: 0.55
, food
Weight: 0.55
Siblings sweet potato
Weight: 0.38
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.37
, potato
Weight: 0.37
, vegetable oil
Weight: 0.37
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for athletes 1.00
be good for runners 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for runners)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beet, be good for athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for runners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be good for runners)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beet, be good for athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(beet, be good for athletes)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(beet, be good for athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for runners)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(beet, be good for athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(beet, be good for runners)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beet, be good for athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(beet, be good for runners)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(beet, be good for athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(beet, be good for runners)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(beet, be good for athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(beet, be good for athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for athletes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beet, be good for athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(beet, be good for athletes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(beet, be good for athletes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be good for runners)