beethoven: was great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents musician
Weight: 0.58
, artist
Weight: 0.56
, genius
Weight: 0.55
, work
Weight: 0.54
Siblings guitarist
Weight: 0.29
, pianist
Weight: 0.28
, dancer
Weight: 0.28
, painter
Weight: 0.28
, exhibit
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
was great 1.00
is great 0.97
has quality good 0.81
is greatest 0.77
is best 0.77
was considered great composer 0.77
was sad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(beethoven, was great)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(work, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(work, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pianist, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(guitarist, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(beethoven, was great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(guitarist, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(guitarist, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(pianist, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(pianist, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(beethoven, was great)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(beethoven, is great)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(beethoven, is great)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(beethoven, is great)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(beethoven, is great)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(beethoven, was sad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(beethoven, was sad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(beethoven, was sad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(beethoven, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(beethoven, was sad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(beethoven, was considered great composer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(beethoven, is greatest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(beethoven, is best)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(beethoven, was considered great composer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(beethoven, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(beethoven, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(beethoven, is greatest)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(beethoven, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(beethoven, was considered great composer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(beethoven, is best)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(beethoven, was considered great composer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(beethoven, is best)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(beethoven, is best)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(beethoven, is greatest)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(beethoven, is greatest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(beethoven, was great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(beethoven, was great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(guitarist, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(pianist, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(beethoven, was great)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)