beggar: be at street

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.64
, people
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.52
Siblings homeless person
Weight: 0.36
, elderly person
Weight: 0.35
, policeman
Weight: 0.34
, dead person
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at street 1.00
be at street corner 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(beggar, be at street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(homeless person, be at street)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(beggar, be at street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(policeman, be at street)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(beggar, be at street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(homeless person, be at street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(homeless person, be at street)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(beggar, be at street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(policeman, be at street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(policeman, be at street)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(beggar, be at street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(beggar, be at street)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(beggar, be at street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(beggar, be at street corner)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(beggar, be at street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(beggar, be at street corner)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(beggar, be at street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(beggar, be at street corner)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(beggar, be at street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(beggar, be at street corner)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(beggar, be at street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(beggar, be at street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(beggar, be at street)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(beggar, be at street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(beggar, be at street)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(beggar, be at street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(policeman, be at street)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(beggar, be at street) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(homeless person, be at street)