behavior: be different in pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.63
, act
Weight: 0.61
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
, indicator
Weight: 0.59
Siblings sexual activity
Weight: 0.71
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68
, altruism
Weight: 0.68
, cigarette smoking
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different in pets 1.00
be different in animals 0.90
be different in wild animals 0.84
be seen in animals 0.80
affect skunks 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(activity, affect skunks)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(behavior, be different in pets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be different in pets)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(activity, affect skunks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be different in pets)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(activity, affect skunks)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be different in pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be seen in animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(activity, affect skunks)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(behavior, be different in pets)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(behavior, be different in pets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be different in pets)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(altruism, be seen in animals)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(altruism, be seen in animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be different in pets)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(behavior, be different in pets)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(behavior, be different in pets)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(behavior, be different in animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be different in pets)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(behavior, be different in animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(behavior, be different in pets)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(behavior, be different in animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(behavior, be different in pets)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(behavior, be different in wild animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(behavior, be different in pets)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be different in wild animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be different in pets)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(behavior, be different in wild animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(behavior, be different in pets)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(behavior, be different in wild animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(behavior, be different in pets)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be different in animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(behavior, be different in pets)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(behavior, be different in pets)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be different in pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(behavior, be different in pets)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(behavior, be different in pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be different in pets)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(activity, affect skunks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be different in pets)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(altruism, be seen in animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(behavior, be different in pets)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(activity, affect skunks)