behavior: be in organizations political

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.63
, act
Weight: 0.61
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
, indicator
Weight: 0.59
Siblings sexual activity
Weight: 0.71
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68
, altruism
Weight: 0.68
, cigarette smoking
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in organizations political 1.00
be in organizations 0.90
has quality organizations 0.85
be important to government 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(indicator, be important to government)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(behavior, be in organizations political)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(behavior, be in organizations political)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(indicator, be important to government)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in organizations political)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(indicator, be important to government)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in organizations political)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, has quality organizations)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(indicator, be important to government)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(behavior, be in organizations political)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(behavior, be in organizations political)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(behavior, be in organizations political)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(drunk driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, has quality organizations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(behavior, be in organizations political)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(behavior, be in organizations political)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(behavior, be in organizations political)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(behavior, be in organizations)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(behavior, be in organizations political)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(behavior, be in organizations)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(behavior, be in organizations political)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(behavior, be in organizations)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(behavior, be in organizations political)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in organizations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(behavior, be in organizations political)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(behavior, be in organizations political)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in organizations political)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(behavior, be in organizations political)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(behavior, be in organizations political)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in organizations political)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(indicator, be important to government)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in organizations political)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(drunk driving, has quality organizations)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(behavior, be in organizations political)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(indicator, be important to government)