behavior: lead in working environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.63
, act
Weight: 0.61
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
, indicator
Weight: 0.59
Siblings sexual activity
Weight: 0.71
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68
, altruism
Weight: 0.68
, cigarette smoking
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
lead in working environment 1.00
lead in environment 0.94
affect environment 0.79
make impact on environment 0.77
affect natural environment 0.76
make positive impact on environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(activity, make positive impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(behavior, lead in working environment)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(activity, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(behavior, lead in working environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(activity, affect environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(activity, make positive impact on environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(activity, affect environment)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(activity, make positive impact on environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(activity, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(behavior, lead in working environment)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(activity, make positive impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(behavior, lead in working environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(behavior, lead in working environment)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(behavior, lead in environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(behavior, affect environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(behavior, affect environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(behavior, lead in environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(behavior, lead in environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(behavior, affect environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(behavior, lead in environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(behavior, affect environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(behavior, lead in working environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(behavior, lead in working environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(activity, affect environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(activity, make positive impact on environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(activity, affect environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(behavior, lead in working environment)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(activity, make positive impact on environment)