belgium: want split

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents market
Weight: 0.58
, united states
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.56
, nation
Weight: 0.55
Siblings norway
Weight: 0.34
, switzerland
Weight: 0.34
, austria
Weight: 0.34
, west germany
Weight: 0.34
, greece
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
want split 1.00
is divided 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nation, is divided)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(belgium, want split)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(belgium, want split)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(nation, is divided)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(belgium, want split)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(nation, is divided)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nation, is divided)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(belgium, want split)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(belgium, want split)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(belgium, want split)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(belgium, want split)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(belgium, want split)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(belgium, is divided)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(belgium, want split)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(belgium, is divided)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(belgium, want split)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(belgium, is divided)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(belgium, want split)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(belgium, is divided)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(belgium, want split)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(belgium, want split)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(belgium, want split)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(belgium, want split)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(belgium, want split)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(belgium, want split)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(nation, is divided)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(belgium, want split)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(nation, is divided)