belgium: was formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents market
Weight: 0.58
, united states
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.56
, nation
Weight: 0.55
Siblings norway
Weight: 0.34
, switzerland
Weight: 0.34
, austria
Weight: 0.34
, west germany
Weight: 0.34
, greece
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was formed 1.00
was founded 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(norway, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(west germany, was formed)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(greece, was founded)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(norway, was formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(norway, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(norway, was formed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(west germany, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(west germany, was formed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(greece, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(greece, was founded)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(norway, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(norway, was founded)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(switzerland, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(switzerland, was founded)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(belgium, was formed)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(belgium, was founded)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(belgium, was founded)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(belgium, was founded)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(belgium, was founded)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(belgium, was formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(belgium, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(norway, was formed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(west germany, was formed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(switzerland, was founded)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(norway, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(belgium, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(greece, was founded)