benefit: is noun

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost benefit analysis
Weight: 0.64
, implication
Weight: 0.61
, option
Weight: 0.61
, operating expense
Weight: 0.60
Siblings increase
Weight: 0.64
, unemployment
Weight: 0.63
, savings
Weight: 0.63
, enjoyment
Weight: 0.62
, free radical
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
is noun 1.00
is idea noun 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(benefit, is noun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(increase, is noun)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(benefit, is noun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(enjoyment, is noun)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(benefit, is noun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(enjoyment, is idea noun)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(benefit, is noun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(increase, is noun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(increase, is noun)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(benefit, is noun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(enjoyment, is noun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(enjoyment, is noun)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(benefit, is noun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(enjoyment, is idea noun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(enjoyment, is idea noun)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(benefit, is noun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(benefit, is noun)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(benefit, is noun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(benefit, is noun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(benefit, is noun)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(benefit, is noun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(benefit, is noun)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(benefit, is noun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(increase, is noun)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(benefit, is noun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(enjoyment, is noun)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(benefit, is noun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(enjoyment, is idea noun)