benefits: is taxed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.46
, site
Weight: 0.40
, program
Weight: 0.39
, benefit
Weight: 0.39
, solution
Weight: 0.38
Siblings savings
Weight: 0.29
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.29
, insurance
Weight: 0.29
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.29
, status
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
is taxed 1.00
is taxable 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(benefits, is taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(savings, is taxed)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(benefits, is taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, is taxed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(benefits, is taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(reimbursement, is taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(reimbursement, is taxed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(benefits, is taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(savings, is taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(savings, is taxed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(benefits, is taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(benefits, is taxed)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(benefits, is taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(benefits, is taxable)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(benefits, is taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(benefits, is taxable)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(benefits, is taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(benefits, is taxable)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(benefits, is taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(benefits, is taxable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(benefits, is taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(benefits, is taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(benefits, is taxed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(benefits, is taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(benefits, is taxed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(benefits, is taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(savings, is taxed)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(benefits, is taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(reimbursement, is taxed)