bengal tiger: get food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tiger
Weight: 0.79
, species
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, show
Weight: 0.45
Siblings rhino
Weight: 0.38
, elephant
Weight: 0.38
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.37
, cougar
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
get food 1.00
be at top of food chain 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rhino, get food)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(monkey, get food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(elephant, get food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(bengal tiger, get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(monkey, get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(monkey, get food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(bengal tiger, get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(rhino, get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(rhino, get food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(bengal tiger, get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(elephant, get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(elephant, get food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(bengal tiger, get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(bengal tiger, get food)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(bengal tiger, get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, be at top of food chain)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(bengal tiger, get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(bengal tiger, be at top of food chain)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(bengal tiger, get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(bengal tiger, be at top of food chain)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(bengal tiger, get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, be at top of food chain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(bengal tiger, get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, get food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(bengal tiger, get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, get food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(rhino, get food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(monkey, get food)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(elephant, get food)