best: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents great
Weight: 0.60
, award
Weight: 0.60
, song
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.55
Siblings good book
Weight: 0.33
, good
Weight: 0.33
, good person
Weight: 0.33
, good luck
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality help 0.80
has quality start 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(best, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(good person, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(best, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(good person, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(good person, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(best, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(best, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(best, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(best, has quality help)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(best, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(best, has quality start)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(best, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(best, has quality start)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(best, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(best, has quality help)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(best, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(best, has quality start)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(best, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(best, has quality start)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(best, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(best, has quality help)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(best, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(best, has quality help)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(best, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(best, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(best, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(best, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(best, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(best, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(good person, has quality worth)