beverage: taste colder chewing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.78
, segment
Weight: 0.61
, snack
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.59
, liquor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings soda pop
Weight: 0.71
, white wine
Weight: 0.70
, hot coffee
Weight: 0.69
, vodka
Weight: 0.67
, beer
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste colder chewing 1.00
taste better cold 0.85
taste cold 0.84
taste better warm beverages 0.81
taste better then warm beverages 0.81
taste worse at room temperature 0.80
taste then warm beverages 0.79
taste warm beverages 0.79
taste better beverages 0.76
be more refreshing than warm ones 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(beverage, taste colder chewing)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(beverage, taste worse at room temperature)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(beverage, taste worse at room temperature)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beverage, taste better cold)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(beverage, taste worse at room temperature)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(beverage, taste cold)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(beverage, taste worse at room temperature)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(beverage, taste better then warm beverages)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(beverage, be more refreshing than warm ones)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(beverage, be more refreshing than warm ones)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(beverage, taste better cold)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(beverage, taste cold)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(beverage, be more refreshing than warm ones)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(beverage, be more refreshing than warm ones)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beverage, taste better cold)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(beverage, taste better then warm beverages)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(beverage, taste cold)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(beverage, taste better cold)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(beverage, taste cold)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(beverage, taste better then warm beverages)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(beverage, taste better then warm beverages)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(beverage, taste colder chewing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(beverage, taste colder chewing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(beverage, taste colder chewing)