bidet: be at french hotel

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.43
, accessory
Weight: 0.43
, service
Weight: 0.38
, toilet
Weight: 0.38
, bathroom
Weight: 0.35
Siblings shower
Weight: 0.30
, bath
Weight: 0.30
, toilet seat
Weight: 0.29
, toilet paper
Weight: 0.29
, fireplace
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at french hotel 1.00
be at french hotel room 0.97
be at hotel 0.80
be at hotel room 0.78
be at european bathroom 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(bathroom, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bidet, be at french hotel)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(bathroom, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bidet, be at french hotel)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(toilet, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bidet, be at french hotel)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(toilet, be at hotel)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(bathroom, be at hotel)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(bathroom, be at hotel)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(toilet, be at hotel)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(bathroom, be at hotel)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bathroom, be at hotel)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(shower, be at hotel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bath, be at hotel room)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(bathroom, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(bidet, be at french hotel)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(bathroom, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(bidet, be at french hotel)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(toilet, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(bidet, be at french hotel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(shower, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(shower, be at hotel)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(bath, be at hotel room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(bath, be at hotel room)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(bidet, be at french hotel)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(bidet, be at french hotel room)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(bidet, be at french hotel room)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(bidet, be at french hotel room)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(bidet, be at french hotel room)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(bidet, be at hotel)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bidet, be at french hotel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bidet, be at french hotel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(bathroom, be at hotel)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(bathroom, be at hotel)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(toilet, be at hotel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(bath, be at hotel room)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(shower, be at hotel)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(bathroom, be at hotel)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(bathroom, be at hotel)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(bidet, be at french hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(toilet, be at hotel)