bigot: have crappy graphic design

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents word
Weight: 0.61
, term
Weight: 0.54
, insult
Weight: 0.53
, idiot
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.45
Siblings racist
Weight: 0.35
, cunt
Weight: 0.34
, nigger
Weight: 0.34
, moron
Weight: 0.34
, homophobe
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have crappy graphic design 1.00
have crappy design 0.93
have graphic design 0.93
have design 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bigot, have crappy graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(bigot, have crappy graphic design)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(bigot, have crappy graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(bigot, have graphic design)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(bigot, have crappy graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(bigot, have graphic design)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(bigot, have crappy graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bigot, have crappy design)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bigot, have crappy graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(bigot, have graphic design)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(bigot, have crappy graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(bigot, have design)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(bigot, have crappy graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(bigot, have graphic design)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(bigot, have crappy graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(bigot, have design)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bigot, have crappy graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(bigot, have design)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bigot, have crappy graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(bigot, have crappy design)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(bigot, have crappy graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(bigot, have crappy design)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(bigot, have crappy graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(bigot, have crappy design)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(bigot, have crappy graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(bigot, have design)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(bigot, have crappy graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bigot, have crappy graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(bigot, have crappy graphic design)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bigot, have crappy graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bigot, have crappy graphic design)