bike: be more expensive than cars

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motor vehicle
Weight: 0.63
, vehicle
Weight: 0.63
, game
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.59
Siblings scooter
Weight: 0.72
, inner tube
Weight: 0.59
, honda
Weight: 0.58
, chopper
Weight: 0.53
, suzuki
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than cars 1.00
be better than cars 0.93
be faster than cars 0.92
be louder than cars 0.85
is expensive 0.83
be faster than horses 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(inner tube, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scooter, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(honda, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chopper, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chopper, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(chopper, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(honda, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(honda, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(scooter, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(scooter, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(inner tube, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(inner tube, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(bike, be more expensive than cars)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(bike, be faster than cars)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(bike, be faster than cars)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bike, be faster than cars)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(bike, be better than cars)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(bike, be better than cars)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(bike, be better than cars)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(bike, be louder than cars)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(bike, be louder than cars)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(bike, be faster than horses)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(bike, be faster than horses)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(bike, be faster than horses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(bike, be louder than cars)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(bike, be faster than cars)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(bike, be better than cars)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bike, be louder than cars)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(bike, be faster than horses)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bike, is expensive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bike, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bike, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(bike, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(bike, be more expensive than cars)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(bike, be more expensive than cars)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chopper, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(honda, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(scooter, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(bike, be more expensive than cars)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(inner tube, is expensive)