bill: be added to constitution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents provision
Weight: 0.74
, proposal
Weight: 0.74
, policy
Weight: 0.67
, measure
Weight: 0.66
Siblings dollar bill
Weight: 0.76
, act
Weight: 0.61
, passage
Weight: 0.59
, spending
Weight: 0.58
, caucus
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
be added to constitution 1.00
be in constitution 0.96
be important to constitution 0.96
be on territory significant in constitution 0.85
be on national territory significant in constitution 0.84
were recognizing community property rights included in texas constitution 0.78
is democratic 0.76
be enacted in parliament 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(provision, be on national territory significant in constitution)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(bill, be added to constitution)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(provision, be on territory significant in constitution)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(bill, be added to constitution)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(provision, were recognizing community property rights included in texas constitution)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(bill, be added to constitution)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(provision, be on territory significant in constitution)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(provision, be on national territory significant in constitution)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(provision, were recognizing community property rights included in texas constitution)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(provision, were recognizing community property rights included in texas constitution)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(provision, be on national territory significant in constitution)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(provision, be on territory significant in constitution)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(caucus, is democratic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(provision, be on territory significant in constitution)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(bill, be added to constitution)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(provision, be on national territory significant in constitution)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(bill, be added to constitution)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(provision, were recognizing community property rights included in texas constitution)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(bill, be added to constitution)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(caucus, is democratic)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(caucus, is democratic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(bill, be added to constitution)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bill, be important to constitution)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(bill, be important to constitution)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(bill, be important to constitution)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(bill, be important to constitution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(bill, be added to constitution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(bill, be added to constitution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(provision, be on territory significant in constitution)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(provision, be on national territory significant in constitution)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(provision, were recognizing community property rights included in texas constitution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(caucus, is democratic)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(provision, be on territory significant in constitution)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(provision, be on national territory significant in constitution)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(bill, be added to constitution)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(provision, were recognizing community property rights included in texas constitution)