bill: be belamy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents provision
Weight: 0.74
, proposal
Weight: 0.74
, policy
Weight: 0.67
, measure
Weight: 0.66
Siblings dollar bill
Weight: 0.76
, act
Weight: 0.61
, passage
Weight: 0.59
, spending
Weight: 0.58
, caucus
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
be belamy 1.00
be in 1996 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(bill, be belamy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(passage, be in 1996)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(bill, be belamy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(passage, be in 1996) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(passage, be in 1996)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(bill, be belamy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(bill, be belamy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(bill, be belamy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(bill, be belamy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(bill, be belamy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(bill, be belamy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(bill, be belamy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(bill, be belamy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(passage, be in 1996)