bill: go up in winter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents provision
Weight: 0.74
, proposal
Weight: 0.74
, policy
Weight: 0.67
, measure
Weight: 0.66
Siblings dollar bill
Weight: 0.76
, act
Weight: 0.61
, passage
Weight: 0.59
, spending
Weight: 0.58
, caucus
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
go up in winter 1.00
up 0.79
be on summer bay 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(measure, up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bill, go up in winter)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(bill, go up in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(measure, up)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bill, go up in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(measure, up)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(measure, up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bill, go up in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(bill, go up in winter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(bill, go up in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(bill, go up in winter)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(bill, go up in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bill, be on summer bay)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(bill, go up in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(bill, be on summer bay)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(bill, go up in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bill, be on summer bay)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bill, go up in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(bill, be on summer bay)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(bill, go up in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bill, go up in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bill, go up in winter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(bill, go up in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bill, go up in winter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bill, go up in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(measure, up)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(bill, go up in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(measure, up)