binder: be at backpack

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.60
, agent
Weight: 0.58
, resin
Weight: 0.57
Siblings ring binder
Weight: 0.75
, starch
Weight: 0.54
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.35
, raw material
Weight: 0.35
, manila folder
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at backpack 1.00
be at bookbag 0.85
be at briefcase 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(binder, be at backpack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ring binder, be at backpack)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(binder, be at backpack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(manila folder, be at briefcase)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(binder, be at backpack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(ring binder, be at backpack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(ring binder, be at backpack)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(binder, be at backpack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(manila folder, be at briefcase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(manila folder, be at briefcase)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(binder, be at backpack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(binder, be at backpack)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(binder, be at backpack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(binder, be at bookbag)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(binder, be at backpack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(binder, be at bookbag)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(binder, be at backpack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(binder, be at bookbag)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(binder, be at backpack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(binder, be at bookbag)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(binder, be at backpack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(binder, be at backpack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(binder, be at backpack)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(binder, be at backpack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(binder, be at backpack)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(binder, be at backpack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(ring binder, be at backpack)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(binder, be at backpack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(manila folder, be at briefcase)