binoculars: be at sport good store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.53
, technology
Weight: 0.52
, equipment
Weight: 0.51
, object
Weight: 0.50
, tool
Weight: 0.49
Siblings flashlight
Weight: 0.32
, telescope
Weight: 0.32
, compass
Weight: 0.31
, tripod
Weight: 0.31
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at sport good store 1.00
be at store 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tool, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(binoculars, be at sport good store)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(binoculars, be at sport good store)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(binoculars, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(item, be at store)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(binoculars, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(tool, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at store)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(item, be at store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tool, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(binoculars, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(binoculars, be at sport good store)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(binoculars, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(binoculars, be at sport good store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(binoculars, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(binoculars, be at sport good store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(binoculars, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(binoculars, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, be at sport good store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(binoculars, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(binoculars, be at sport good store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(tool, be at store)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(binoculars, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(tool, be at store)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(binoculars, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)