binoculars: be shorter than telescopes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents optics
Weight: 0.55
, item
Weight: 0.53
, technology
Weight: 0.52
, equipment
Weight: 0.51
, object
Weight: 0.50
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.33
, flashlight
Weight: 0.32
, telescope
Weight: 0.32
, lens
Weight: 0.31
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be shorter than telescopes 1.00
be better than monoculars 0.77
be used in astronomy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, be shorter than telescopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be used in astronomy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(binoculars, be shorter than telescopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(telescope, be used in astronomy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(telescope, be used in astronomy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(binoculars, be shorter than telescopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(binoculars, be shorter than telescopes)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(binoculars, be shorter than telescopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(binoculars, be better than monoculars)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(binoculars, be shorter than telescopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(binoculars, be better than monoculars)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(binoculars, be shorter than telescopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(binoculars, be better than monoculars)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(binoculars, be shorter than telescopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(binoculars, be used in astronomy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(binoculars, be shorter than telescopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(binoculars, be used in astronomy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(binoculars, be shorter than telescopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, be better than monoculars)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(binoculars, be shorter than telescopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, be used in astronomy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(binoculars, be shorter than telescopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(binoculars, be used in astronomy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(binoculars, be shorter than telescopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(binoculars, be shorter than telescopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, be shorter than telescopes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(binoculars, be shorter than telescopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(binoculars, be shorter than telescopes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(binoculars, be shorter than telescopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(telescope, be used in astronomy)