biologist: use scientific notation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.71
, researcher
Weight: 0.62
, specialist
Weight: 0.55
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.55
Siblings naturalist
Weight: 0.64
, stephen jay gould
Weight: 0.58
, geologist
Weight: 0.58
, ecologist
Weight: 0.54
, botanist
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
use scientific notation 1.00
use scientific names 0.86
give scientific name 0.82
give scientific names 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(scientist, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(biologist, use scientific notation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(biologist, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(scientist, use scientific notation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use scientific notation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(scientist, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(biologist, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(biologist, use scientific notation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(biologist, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(biologist, use scientific notation)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(biologist, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use scientific names)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(biologist, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(biologist, use scientific names)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(biologist, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(biologist, give scientific names)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(biologist, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(biologist, use scientific names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(biologist, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(biologist, use scientific names)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(biologist, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(biologist, give scientific names)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(biologist, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(biologist, give scientific names)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(biologist, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(biologist, give scientific names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(biologist, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(biologist, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use scientific notation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(biologist, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(biologist, use scientific notation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(scientist, use scientific notation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(biologist, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(scientist, use scientific notation)